Synthetic Data CompaniesGet a quote
Pages

Should you use synthetic data?

Use synthetic data when real data is too sensitive to share, too scarce in rare scenes, or too slow to label, and only if you can test the result on real data. If masking would do, or rare events are the whole point, start elsewhere. Six questions below give a verdict.

Answer six questions

Can you keep back some real data to test the result against?
Do you need labeled images or sensor data of scenes that are rare or hard to capture?
Would masked or subsetted production data do the job (for example, a staging database)?
Are rare events, such as fraud or defects, the main thing your model must learn?
Do you have at least tens of thousands of source rows to learn from?
Is the real data too sensitive to share with the people or partners who need it?

Rules of thumb written by this site from common data-engineering practice. Not a vendor's assessment, not an offer and not a quote; a vendor's own trial on your data is the real test.

How is the verdict worked out?

The rules are checked in this order, and the first one that fits your answers gives the verdict.

Decision rules used above, in order
IfVerdictWhy
No real data held back to test againstNot yetWithout a real test set you cannot tell whether synthetic data helps or quietly hurts. Set one aside first.
You need rare or hard-to-capture labeled scenesTrial a simulation vendorRendered scenes come with exact labels and cover cases you cannot film. Measure the gap on real images.
Masked production data would doTry masking firstCheaper, simpler and closer to production. Generate only if masking leaves too much real data exposed.
Rare events are the targetUse with cautionGenerators smooth away or copy outliers. Use synthetic data for pipelines and sharing, real data for the rare class.
Fewer than tens of thousands of source rowsProbably notSmall tables give the generator little to learn and more chance to memorize individual rows.
The data is too sensitive to share as it isGood case for a tabular trialThis is the job tabular synthetic data does best. Ask for the privacy method in writing.
None of the aboveWeak caseReal data under ordinary access controls may serve you better than a generator.

For the warning signs that show up once a trial is running, read when synthetic data fails. To see who sells it, go to the synthetic data vendor list.

About this decision aid

Who wrote these rules?

This site, from common practice in data engineering and machine learning. They are rules of thumb, not a vendor's assessment, and not a quote for any project.

Why does a real test set come first?

Every quality test for synthetic data ends with a comparison against real data the generator never saw. Without it, a model trained on synthetic data can look good on synthetic test data and fail in production.

Is synthetic data cheaper than real data?

Sometimes, per labeled image in simulation work. For tabular data the comparison is with masking and access controls, which are often cheaper. Only one vendor on our list publishes prices: Rendered.ai, from $5,000 a month (read 7 Nov 2026).

Can I use synthetic data to evaluate a model?

For stress tests and scenarios you design, yes. For the headline accuracy number, use real held-out data.

Get a quote

Three parts: the company location, a contact for replies, then what the generated data has to do. The final part is optional.

Disclosure: this is an introduction service, and any vendor it introduces you to can pay the site for that introduction. Each brief is read by a person and matched against vendors' published terms; you get the names first, and nothing goes to any vendor without your go-ahead.

Please do not send data, samples, schemas with real values or credentials through this form. A written description is all we need.

Part 1 of 3

Where is the company based?

Five digits are enough.

Get a quote